THE GAME IN NUMBERS Tests · ODIs · T20Is · Men & women
CRICKET WICKET.
CRICKET WICKET RESEARCH

ODI scoring across decades: measure pace without hiding missing balls

A weighted batting strike-rate comparison across ODI decades, separating men and women and disclosing incomplete historical innings.

Cricket Wicket · Published · Data checked

THE QUESTION

How quickly did batters score in different decades? The answer requires both runs and balls. This study sums batter runs and balls only when every listed batter in an innings has the necessary figures, then compares men’s and women’s ODIs separately.

Men · ODI scoring pace

Men ODI runs per 100 balls in included innings
1970s61.34
1980s66.52
1990s69.85
2000s75.37
2010s83.80
2020s87.84
Men ODI scoring periods and missing-data coverage
DecadeAvailable inningsIncluded inningsExcluded inningsBatter runsBalls facedRuns/100 balls
1970s150150026,79643,67861.34
1980s1,0221,0220187,368281,66466.52
1990s1,7561,7560339,630486,21769.85
2000s2,3592,3590478,254634,53075.37
2010s2,1362,1360474,696566,40183.80
2020s8938930202,128230,09387.84

Using periods with at least 100 included innings, the 1970s sample scores at 61.34 runs per 100 balls and the 2020s sample at 87.84, a change of 26.50 runs per 100 balls. These are the first and last qualifying archive periods, not estimates of every ODI played in those decades.

Women · ODI scoring pace

Women ODI runs per 100 balls in included innings
1980s48.18
1990s50.03
2000s55.70
2010s64.86
2020s76.27
Women ODI scoring periods and missing-data coverage
DecadeAvailable inningsIncluded inningsExcluded inningsBatter runsBalls facedRuns/100 balls
1970s2802800
1980s139181212,6515,50248.18
1990s2451578821,13842,24750.03
2000s72469232101,703182,58155.70
2010s8778761149,314230,20364.86
2020s6496490125,192164,13076.27

Using periods with at least 100 included innings, the 1990s sample scores at 50.03 runs per 100 balls and the 2020s sample at 76.27, a change of 26.24 runs per 100 balls. These are the first and last qualifying archive periods, not estimates of every ODI played in those decades.

Why the missing-data column matters

Discarding only the batters with missing balls would keep some of an innings’ runs and remove part of its denominator. That can produce a misleading rate. Here the entire affected innings is excluded. Older scorecards can be less complete, so the surviving sample can still be selective.

Team extras do not appear in the numerator. Reduced-overs and unfinished innings remain when their batting figures are usable. The current decade is partial. Differences can reflect the mix of teams, venues, innings lengths and conditions; this table does not identify which factor caused a change.